National Aquatic Resources Research & Development Agency (NARA)

Use of Biological Treatment Methods to Treat Shrimp farm Effluents (Record no. 9434)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field nam a22 7a 4500
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20181226140530.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 181214b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Transcribing agency NARA
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
9 (RLIN) 17534
Personal name Corea, A.S.L.E.
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Use of Biological Treatment Methods to Treat Shrimp farm Effluents
260 ## - PUBLISHER, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. NARA,
Place of publication, distribution, etc. Sri Lanka,
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 1p.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Did flhrimp culture effluents have been known to release high concentrations of nutrients, lUttjloikled solids, and toxic metabolites to the environment. Since the shrimp farms release llisir effluents directly to the same water body that acts as the water source for shrimp SUilUi’o, it has caused deterioration of water quality in the receiving water source. Therefore, lF&ti(monl. of effluent before release was required and the use of biological treatment methods VVtirt Introduced to upgrade the quality of effluent.<br/>|lx Bpecies of locally available molluscs were used to treat the effluent and 3 species showed good survival under farm conditions. Molluscs were capable of reducing 30% of suspended ptil'llcles in 48 hours. Seaweeds were used to reduce nutrients but when seaweeds were (Italy exposed to the effluent the survival rates were low[>40%]. But when effluents were permitted to flow through a settling tank prior to treatment, survival increased to 45- 50% fijld 20% nutrients were reduced in 24 hours. Use of milk fish in treatment tanks reduced the ladlinorit load by 60% at the end of the culture cycle. Use of probiotics to improve water Cjlifllity through reducing the levels of toxic metabolites were not very successful as there WM no significant difference in the water quality with respect to 6 types of probiotics tested. Tills may be due to the method of use or due to environmental conditions in the farming which do not favour the activity of these probiotics. Two probiotic types showed FSduolion of ammonia, nitrite and sulphide while one was successful in reducing only Pj11i 110 ilia.<br/>PUi'lH.or research is required to identify better methods of upgrading water quality without damaging the environment further, to identify other suitable organisms that could be used for liTliibrit treatment, and develop probiotic species that are adapted to the prevailing Jlivli'omuental conditions in the farming areas. Development of complete recirculation iyalfliiis, incorporating biological organisms to reduce the entry of pathogens, entry of (IllPi'lors, and adverse impacts of farms on environment and adverse impacts of environment QH ftirrns would be the only solution to sustainable shrimp culture activities.
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
9 (RLIN) 17625
Personal name Jayasinghe, J.M.P.K.
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Research Papers
Source of classification or shelving scheme Dewey Decimal Classification
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Inventory number Total Checkouts Barcode Date last seen Copy number Price effective from Koha item type
        NARA Main Library NARA Main Library Ready Reference 18.12.2018 RP0218   RP0218 18.12.2018 RP0218 18.12.2018 Research Papers

NARA Library Management System Maintaining by Ceymarc Technologies